page
1 | 2 | 3
“Write
on” Activities
On
Day two, the stages of a whole
writing lesson were analysed and put into practice. The article below
touches on the important areas
Product and process writing: A comparison
There are several ways to approach writing in the classroom. It should
be said at the beginning that there is not necessarily any 'right' or
'best' way to teach writing skills. The best practice in any situation
will depend on the type of student and the text type being studied.
A product
approach
This is a traditional approach, in which students are encouraged to mimic
a model text, which is usually presented and analysed at an early stage.
A model for such an approach is outlined below:
• Stage 1
Recognition. Model texts are read, and then features of the genre are
highlighted. For example, if studying a formal letter, students' attention
may be drawn to the importance of paragraphing and the language used to
make formal requests.
• Stage 2
Controlled Practice of the highlighted features, usually in isolation.
So, if students are studying a formal letter, they may be asked to practise
the language used to make formal requests, practising the 'I would be
grateful if you wouldÉ' structure.
• Stage 3
Organisation of ideas. This stage is very important. Those who favour
this approach believe that the organisation of ideas is more important
than the ideas themselves and as important as the control of language.
• Stage 4
Writing. Students choose from a choice of comparable writing tasks. Individually,
they use the skills, structures and vocabulary they have been taught to
produce the product.
A process
approach
Process approaches to writing tend to focus more on the varied classroom
activities which promote the development of language use; brainstorming,
group discussion, re-writing. Such an approach can have any number of
stages, though a typical sequence of activities could proceed as follows:
Stage 1
Generating ideas by brainstorming and discussion. E.g. Students could
be discussing qualities needed to do a certain job. The teacher only provides
language support if required, so as not to inhibit students in the production
of ideas.
• Stage 2
Students extend ideas into note form, and judge quality and usefulness
of ideas.
• Stage 3
Students organise ideas into a mind map, spidergram, or linear form. This
stage helps to make the (hierarchical) relationship of ideas more immediately
obvious, which helps students with the structure of their texts.
• Stage 4
Students write the first draft. This is done in class and frequently in
pairs or groups.
• Stage 5
Drafts are exchanged, so that students become the readers of each otherÕs
work and then they make suggestions to improve each other's texts.
• Stage 6
Drafts are returned and improvements are made based upon peer feedback.
• Stage 7
A final draft is written.
• Stage 8
Students once again, exchange and read each otherÕs work and perhaps
even write a response or reply.
A summary
of the differences:
| Product
writing |
• imitate
model text
• organisation of ideas more important than ideas themselves
• one draft
• features highlighted including controlled practice of those
features
• individual
• emphasis on end product |
| Process
writing |
• text
as a resource for comparison
• ideas as starting point
• more than one draft
• more global, focus on purpose, theme, text
• type, i.e., reader is emphasised
• collaborative
• emphasis on creative process |
Which approach to
use
This really depends on you, the teacher, and on the students, and on the
genre of the text. Certain genres lend themselves more favourably to one
approach than the other.
Formal letters, for example, or postcards, in which the features are very
fixed, would be perhaps more suited to a product-driven approach, in which
focus on the layout, style, organisation and grammar could greatly help
students in dealing with this type of writing task.
Other genres, such
as discursive essays and narratives, may lend themselves to process-driven
approaches, which focus on students' ideas. Discursive activities are
suited to brainstorming and discussing ideas in groups, and the collaborative
writing and exchanging of texts help the students to direct their writing
to their reader, therefore making a more successful text.
One or the other
The two approaches are not necessarily incompatible. I believe that process
writing, i.e. re-drafting, and collaboration can be integrated with the
practise of studying written models in the classroom. What I take from
the process approach is the collaborative work, the discussion which is
so important in generating and organising ideas. Once students have written
their first drafts, model texts can be introduced as texts for comparison.
I also like to incorporate
the exchanging of drafts, so that the students become the readers of each
otherÕs work. This is an important part of the writing experience
because students develop an awareness of the fact that a writer is producing
something to be read by someone else.
As Lewis Carroll makes clear in Alice's adventures in Wonderland.
"I haven't opened it yet," said the White Rabbit, "but
it seems to be a letter, written by the prisoner to somebody."
"It must have been that," said the King, "unless it was
written to nobody, which isn't usual, you know."
Vanessa Steele
page
1 | 2 | 3
Back
to top |