Issue 8- May 2004
Other Issues

Provincial Workshops
VTTN Quiz
VTTN National Conference
ELT Workshops
BANG ON!
Evaluation Questionnaire
The Resource Page
Contacts
 

VTTN provincial workshops


February/March 2004
in Binh Dinh, Da Nang, Ho Chi Minh City, Khanh Hoa, Nam Dinh, Nghe An, Thanh Hoa, Thai Nguyen, Thua Thien Hue and Yen Bai.

page 1 | 2 | 3

“Write on” Activities

On Day two, the stages of a whole
writing lesson were analysed and put into practice. The article below touches on the important areas


Product and process writing: A comparison
There are several ways to approach writing in the classroom. It should be said at the beginning that there is not necessarily any 'right' or 'best' way to teach writing skills. The best practice in any situation will depend on the type of student and the text type being studied.

A product approach

This is a traditional approach, in which students are encouraged to mimic a model text, which is usually presented and analysed at an early stage. A model for such an approach is outlined below:
• Stage 1
Recognition. Model texts are read, and then features of the genre are highlighted. For example, if studying a formal letter, students' attention may be drawn to the importance of paragraphing and the language used to make formal requests.
• Stage 2
Controlled Practice of the highlighted features, usually in isolation. So, if students are studying a formal letter, they may be asked to practise the language used to make formal requests, practising the 'I would be grateful if you wouldÉ' structure.
• Stage 3
Organisation of ideas. This stage is very important. Those who favour this approach believe that the organisation of ideas is more important than the ideas themselves and as important as the control of language.
• Stage 4
Writing. Students choose from a choice of comparable writing tasks. Individually, they use the skills, structures and vocabulary they have been taught to produce the product.

A process approach

Process approaches to writing tend to focus more on the varied classroom activities which promote the development of language use; brainstorming, group discussion, re-writing. Such an approach can have any number of stages, though a typical sequence of activities could proceed as follows:

Stage 1
Generating ideas by brainstorming and discussion. E.g. Students could be discussing qualities needed to do a certain job. The teacher only provides language support if required, so as not to inhibit students in the production of ideas.
• Stage 2
Students extend ideas into note form, and judge quality and usefulness of ideas.
• Stage 3
Students organise ideas into a mind map, spidergram, or linear form. This stage helps to make the (hierarchical) relationship of ideas more immediately obvious, which helps students with the structure of their texts.
• Stage 4
Students write the first draft. This is done in class and frequently in pairs or groups.
• Stage 5
Drafts are exchanged, so that students become the readers of each otherÕs work and then they make suggestions to improve each other's texts.
• Stage 6
Drafts are returned and improvements are made based upon peer feedback.
• Stage 7
A final draft is written.
• Stage 8
Students once again, exchange and read each otherÕs work and perhaps even write a response or reply.

A summary of the differences:

Product writing
• imitate model text
• organisation of ideas more important than ideas themselves
• one draft
• features highlighted including controlled practice of those features
• individual
• emphasis on end product

Process writing
• text as a resource for comparison
• ideas as starting point
• more than one draft
• more global, focus on purpose, theme, text
• type, i.e., reader is emphasised
• collaborative
• emphasis on creative process

Which approach to use
This really depends on you, the teacher, and on the students, and on the genre of the text. Certain genres lend themselves more favourably to one approach than the other.
Formal letters, for example, or postcards, in which the features are very fixed, would be perhaps more suited to a product-driven approach, in which focus on the layout, style, organisation and grammar could greatly help students in dealing with this type of writing task.

Other genres, such as discursive essays and narratives, may lend themselves to process-driven approaches, which focus on students' ideas. Discursive activities are suited to brainstorming and discussing ideas in groups, and the collaborative writing and exchanging of texts help the students to direct their writing to their reader, therefore making a more successful text.

One or the other
The two approaches are not necessarily incompatible. I believe that process writing, i.e. re-drafting, and collaboration can be integrated with the practise of studying written models in the classroom. What I take from the process approach is the collaborative work, the discussion which is so important in generating and organising ideas. Once students have written their first drafts, model texts can be introduced as texts for comparison.

I also like to incorporate the exchanging of drafts, so that the students become the readers of each otherÕs work. This is an important part of the writing experience because students develop an awareness of the fact that a writer is producing something to be read by someone else.
As Lewis Carroll makes clear in Alice's adventures in Wonderland.
"I haven't opened it yet," said the White Rabbit, "but it seems to be a letter, written by the prisoner to somebody."
"It must have been that," said the King, "unless it was written to nobody, which isn't usual, you know."

Vanessa Steele

page 1 | 2 | 3

Back to top